@article{oai:muroran-it.repo.nii.ac.jp:00008119,
 author = {松名,  隆 and MATSUNA, Takashi},
 journal = {室蘭工業大学研究報告. 文科編, Memoirs of the Muroran Institute of Technology. Cultural science},
 month = {Nov},
 note = {application/pdf, The aim of this paper is to explore the fundamental epistemological f actor that dominates the acceptability of passive sentences in terms of the speaker' s viewpoint. In the first section I will summarize Kuno' s concept of the speaker' s empathy and some discourse principles that relates to our discussion, and give an outline of the two remarks that present some examples which seem to demonstrate the deficiency of these principles. In the second, paying special attention to their functional approaches, I will examine these arguments respectively, and indicate that their approaches have some defects because of their being static and non-structural . Then in the third, I will try my own analysis of some passive sentences by using the concepts of the real viewpoint and the ideal one . After that, I will conclude that the acceptability of passive sentences discussed here is based upon whether a certain disagreement arises in the speaker' s viewpoint.},
 pages = {1--26},
 title = {受身文と話者の視点},
 volume = {37},
 year = {1987},
 yomi = {マツナ, タカシ}
}