@article{oai:muroran-it.repo.nii.ac.jp:00008234,
 author = {長, 利一 and CHO, Toshikazu},
 journal = {室蘭工業大学研究報告. 文科編, Memoirs of the Muroran Institute of Technology. Cultural science},
 month = {Nov},
 note = {application/pdf, ln the post -cold war age， particularly after the Gulf War， many regional conflicts have occurred throughout the world. The threats different from those during the cold war are growing.Under these circumstances， the theory of 'international contribution' is dominant and it claims that the maintenance and recovery of 'international peace and security' should be prior to domestic peace and security Concerning the amendment of the constitution of Japan，there has been a theory that claims the acknowledgment of the existence of the Self -Defense Forces and the Security Treaty between Japan and the U. S. inview of the national defense. But with the change of the historical framework in international politics，a nother trend begins to raise its head ;it aims at release from the ban against sending troops overseas by the Self -Defense Forces in view of 'international peace and security' and ‘international contribution' This paper takes up the two theories and examines them critically. Both theories， one by 'Nationalists' and the other by ‘lnternationalists'， are based not on the ‘Pacifism' of the Constitution but on the domestic and international‘Security'. They give the theoretical bases to ‘international contribution' and try to enlighten the general public.},
 pages = {13--34},
 title = {冷戦後の平和と「安全保障」をめぐる憲法論の動向とその批判的検討ー「国際派」と「国益派」の憲法論・改憲論ー},
 volume = {45},
 year = {1995},
 yomi = {チョウ, トシカズ}
}